Compensation Advisory Studio

Prioritized Action Portfolio

Findings from across the Studio rolled up into a clear executive action plan — with evidence, cost, owner, timing, and risk reduced for each move.

What This Analysis Does

Convert diagnostic findings into a prioritized portfolio of actions. Filter by priority and category, attach recommendations to the deliverable package, and brief the CHRO / CFO / Committee.

Required Data
  • Pay Diagnostics findings
  • Salary Structure diagnostics
  • Cost Scenarios stack
  • Governance controls inventory
  • Pay-equity statistical review
Key Outputs
  • Per-recommendation priority + cost + owner + timing
  • Executive action plan (Immediate / 30 / 60-90 days)
  • Stakeholder-specific advisor commentary
  • Build queue for the Deliverables package
Next Recommended Action

Confirm priorities with CHRO, then push the recommended bundle into Deliverables.

Total Recommendations
8
across 5 categories
High Priority Actions
4
immediate focus
Estimated Investment
$6.88M
annualized + one-time
Estimated Savings
-$1.85M
annualized offset
Risk Reduced
High
market, equity, compression, governance
High
Priority:Category:Showing 8 of 8
HighMarket Competitiveness
Cost
$2.10M

Prioritize Staff Software Engineer remediation to P75

Evidence

Staff Engineers are -12.2% vs target P50 with 28% of incumbents below range minimum. Highest single-role gap in the population.

Business Rationale

L5 Engineering attrition is 1.6× company average; replacement cost averages $185K per role. Targeted critical-role premium pays back inside 9 months.

Recommended Action

Apply critical-role premium up to P75 for Engineering L4/L5 incumbents in Exceeds / Meets+ bands. Hold non-critical roles at P50.

Owner: CHRO + Compensation Lead Timing: Q1 2026 — before next merit cycle Risk reduced: Market & RetentionSource: Pay Diagnostics
HighMarket Competitiveness
Cost
$1.28M

Resolve below-range employees before merit cycle

Evidence

14.2% of in-scope incumbents are below range minimum. Concentrated in Engineering & Sales.

Business Rationale

Below-range employees are exposed to compliance complaints and merit-cycle ceiling problems. Floor adjustments are foundational.

Recommended Action

Bring all below-min employees to range minimum ($1.28M annualized).

HighEquity / Compliance
Cost
$118K

Address statistically significant female IC pay gap

Evidence

Female ICs (P3-P5): -2.8% unexplained gap, statistically significant after 7 controls. Female managers (M5-M6): -3.4% gap.

Business Rationale

Significant unexplained gaps create legal exposure and signal cultural risk. Document remediation criteria before counsel review.

Recommended Action

Fund $118K equity remediation across 30 employees in same cycle as market adjustments. Document criteria.

Owner: Comp Analytics + Legal review Timing: Q1 2026 — bundled with market Risk reduced: Legal & Internal equitySource: Pay Diagnostics
HighMarket Competitiveness
Cost
Neutral

Refresh weak benchmark matches before final committee readout

Evidence

5 weak-confidence matches and 3 outdated survey matches in the Benchmark Match Register. Engineering L5 and Product L4 cuts have weakest coverage.

Business Rationale

Confidence below 80% requires caveat language in the committee pre-read. Closing these matches strengthens defensibility.

Recommended Action

Engage Radford Tech secondary cut for Product L4. Refresh Mercer FP&A data effective date. Run blend re-aging.

MediumStructure Design
Savings
-$210K

Adjust M6 midpoint progression

Evidence

M5 → M6 progression is 27% (above 22% market norm). E2 progression is 35%. Drives title inflation pressure.

Business Rationale

Steep progression in management bands encourages title inflation and undermines job-architecture integrity.

Recommended Action

Compress M5 → M6 to ~22% by lowering M6 midpoint $15-25K. Rebuild M6 range around the new midpoint.

MediumCost / Budget
Savings
-$1.64M

Adopt 4-zone geo pay policy with communication guardrails

Evidence

National-flat policy includes 312 employees who would re-zone. Net annual savings $1.64M.

Business Rationale

Cost-of-labor zoning is sustainable and market-aligned. Done well, the savings fund critical-role remediation.

Recommended Action

Approve 4-zone policy in principle. Grandfather zone-4 outliers. Apply policy to new hires immediately. Pair with a 90-day comms plan.

MediumCost / Budget
Cost
$3.38M

Use targeted remediation instead of across-the-board midpoint movement

Evidence

Bring-to-mid for the full population is $6.24M annualized — funds non-critical roles to the same standard as critical talent.

Business Rationale

Targeted spend has better ROI and a stronger comp-philosophy story than blanket adjustments.

Recommended Action

Pair Bring-to-min ($1.28M) + Critical-role-to-P75 ($2.1M) as the recommended remediation bundle.

MediumGovernance
Cost
Neutral

Update exception approval policy

Evidence

Exception approval policy last reviewed 2023-08 (Overdue). 2-year gap between reviews; current practice has likely drifted.

Business Rationale

Stale exception controls invite audit findings and create inconsistent decisions across HRBPs.

Recommended Action

Schedule a 60-day CHRO review. Add a quarterly exception-volume dashboard. Document updated escalation thresholds.

Executive Action Plan
Sequenced for committee delivery
Immediate · 4
  • Prioritize Staff Software Engineer remediation to P75
  • Resolve below-range employees before merit cycle
  • Address statistically significant female IC pay gap
  • Use targeted remediation instead of across-the-board midpoint movement
Next 30 days · 2
  • Refresh weak benchmark matches before final committee readout
  • Update exception approval policy
Next 60-90 days · 2
  • Adjust M6 midpoint progression
  • Adopt 4-zone geo pay policy with communication guardrails
Bundle Summary
  • Selected8 of 8
  • Net cost$5.03M
  • High-priority included4 of 4

Toggle the Add to Deliverables button on each recommendation to update the package.